Original Published on Aug 09, 2022 at 08:15
By Jim Dumville, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter
The bass-eradication Working Group overseeing the treatment of Miramichi Lake and nearby waters with a fish-killing substance gave area cottage owners 24-hour notice of its planned operation.
Early Tuesday morning, cottage owners received the following message from Working Group spokesperson Neville Crabbe, executive director of communication with the Atlantic Salmon Federation
“Signs have been posted stating the smallmouth project will commence on August 10th.
“Separate signs have been or will be posted announcing that Crown land is closed and access to the lake is prohibited.
Movement in and out of the project area will be restricted and people wishing to leave are advised to do so.”
Working Group members include the Atlantic Salmon Federation, North Shore Micmac District Council, Miramichi Watershed Management Committee, New Brunswick Salmon Council and New Brunswick Wildlife Federation.
Trish Foster, whose family owns a cottage at Miramichi Lake, is part of a group, including cottage owners, First Nation groups and others, opposing the use of Noxfish II. She said some cottage owners are at the lake, and others are trying to get there.
Andrea Polchies — a spokesperson for Connect to the Land, a group protesting the planned treatment of Miramichi Lake — confirmed she and others are paddling on the lake in canoes and kayaks.
The group of paddlers played a roll in halting last year’s plan to treat the lake.
The Working Group contends the Noxfish II, with active substance rotenone, is needed to eradicate the smallmouth bass, which it describes as an invasive species which threatens the Miramichi River’s salmon population.
While Noxfish II will kill most fish and other natural inhabitants of the lake and surrounding waters, the Working Group believes species natural to the regions ecosystem will return.
Experts for the plan’s opponents say use of Noxfish II poses a long-term threat to the water system, while having minimal chance of meeting its objective of eradicating smallmoth bass.
Both the proponents and opponents of the project agree some bass already are beyond the treatment zone. The Working Group, however, believes the small number of bass are unlikely to spawn .
Project opponents, noting bass were first discovered in the lake in 2008, believe non-toxic options such as angling and electrofishing can control the bass population.
Original Published on Aug 09, 2022 at 05:58
Poison protesters against Miramichi Lake NB plan 24/7 watch
By Jim Dumville, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter
The proverbial battle of an unstoppable force meeting an immovable object may come to a head within days or hours at the ordinarily tranquil setting of Miramichi Lake in southwest New Brunswick, near Napadogan.
A group of Miramichi Lake cottage owners, First Nation representatives and members of the general public are making a last-ditch effort to stop a project designed to kill all fish in the lake and the waters flowing from it.
Meanwhile, a Working Group, including the Atlantic Salmon Federation, the North Shore Micmac Council and others, are finalizing its steps to pour deadly Noxfish II, with active ingredient rotenone, into Miramichi Lake, Lake Brook and a portion of the Southwest Branch of the Miramichi River.
The basis of the Working Group’s plan in the short term is to kill all gill-breathing fish in the waters to eradicate the smallmouth bass, considered an invasive species. The long-term goal is to protect the Miramichi River’s most famous and profitable inhabitant — the Atlantic salmon.
The Working Group’s project garnered the full support of Health Canada, the federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans, and the New Brunswick Environment and Natural Resources departments.
The project’s opponents successfully blocked last summer’s attempt to add rotenone to Miramichi Lake by continuously remaining on the lake and forcing the Working Group to postpone its plans until this year. Woodstock First Nation band councillor Andrea Polchies was of the Wolastoqewi mothers and grandmothers leading last year’s protest in canoes and kayaks.
Polchies is continuing her battle again this year as the spokesperson for a group called Connecting to the Land. She, along with other paddlers, plans to maintain a 24-7 watch on the lake to keep Noxfish II out of the lake.
Polchies said she arrived two weeks ago, where she remained except for a couple of days.
Unlike last year, when the Working Group gave cottage owners and others a specific date for the planned project, it promised only 24-hour notice this year. Polchies said she has no idea when they will dump the rotenone into the waters, but it completed much of the preliminary work, such as setting docks and blocking roads into the lake.
“I don’t know. You know, they’re just that sneaky that I can’t. I can’t determine when it’s going to happen. So I said, I have to be here,” Polchies told the River Valley Sun on Friday, Aug 5.
The Indigenous group is working in partnership with the cottage owners and others. Together the project opponents filed two injunctions to stop the process, but cottage owner Trish Foster believes the Working Group will act before the court can issue a ruling.
“I fear it is too late,” said Foster. “Although the Working Group has been notified of two injunctions filed against the project, it appears, based on activity at the lake, that the poison will be applied before a judge can make a ruling.”
While the Working Group is armed with federal, provincial, and Health Canada approvals and examples of successful applications of Noxfish II and rotenone, the opponents counter with their own independent reports, studies and opinions, citing the plan as dangerous or at least ineffective.
The opponents point to an opinion from Nova Scotia biologist Bob Bancroft, who offers an extensive background in rotenone-based eradication projects over several decades, suggesting the high probability the Miramichi Lake project will fail.
“In my estimation, as a biologist, this method of killing so many aquatic vertebrates and invertebrates, in an effort to eliminate one other species, and when the probability of success is almost nil, amounts to a tremendous waste of time and money, while creating an ecological nightmare,” said Bancroft.
Cottage owner John Hildebrand and his sister, veterinarian Dr. Barb Hilldebrand, have extensively researched rotenone and bass eradication since the Working Group first announced the plan in 2019. John said that research clearly indicated the risk does not equal the reward.
While the scientific information regarding rotenone and species eradication is wide and varied, Hildebrand believes the evidence doesn’t support the use of Noxfish II in Miramichi Lake and the Southwest Branch of the Miramichi River.
Hildebrand said the final decision comes down to two central factors.
“Long-term damage, and it’s very unlikely to succeed,” he said.
Hildebrand said independent peer-reviewed studies had said rotenone and the many other chemicals in Noxfish II risk substantial long-term damage to the ecosystem.
He added that the Working Group could not assure that the lake’s native species would return as expected or if the food chain would recuperate without a broken link, affecting aquatic and non-aquatic lifeforms, including birds.
Like many opponents and experts, Hildebrand points out that the Working Group already acknowledged the presence of smallmouth bass beyond the proposed treatment area. He said that alone would nullify a complete eradication.
The Atlantic Salmon Federation Executive Director of Communication Neville Crabbe said the Working Group doesn’t have a precise estimate of the number of bass beyond the treatment point. Still, they believe the chance of bass spawning is negligible.
The Indigenous perspective surrounding the bass eradication project differs significantly among groups. The North Shore Micmac District Council, comprised of chiefs from our seven-Mi’kmaq communities, described the project as Indigenous-led conservation.
While district council spokesperson Taylor Ward said that the council stands in solidarity with the Wolastoqey Nation, representing First Nation communities along the St. John (Wolastoq) River, that bond is unclear.
Policies said most members of the Wolastoqey Nation believe the Working Group refused to listen to their views.
This item reprinted with permission from the River Valley Sun, Woodstock, New Brunswick